The mid-range and high frequencies seemed clearer, but I found it not quite as easy to differentiate individual sounds in complex or noisy mixes as with the AKG K240 MkIIs. The circumaural earpads fitted my ears without cramping, but there may not be quite enough space for some. They're the second-least sensitive of all the headphones in this group (‑3dB), and offer moderate isolation. Paul White, The SRH840s are comfortable and provide pretty good isolation from external noise. Audio-Technica: Audio‑Technica +44 (0)113 277 1441. There's also a good sense of stereo imaging. The frequency response seems very well balanced, and offers excellent bass extension, with only the very lowest sub‑bass feeling in any way underpowered. They have well-padded and large ear cups that fit comfortably around most listeners' ears. They don't really cut it for mixing, where the lack of detail and overblown, pillow‑like bass militate against useful balance or EQ decisions, and I can't recommend the DT150s in that role, given the competition. The Beyerdynamic DT880 has a lot of the same features as the AKG K702 but is a lot less expensive, coming in at around $200 less on the list price. They're accurate enough for reliable mixing, but the lack of physical stability puts me off. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO are comfortable headphones but a bit tight on your head. This made it tricky to judge balance for bass instruments objectively or evaluate low‑end and low mid-range EQ adjustments — and I'm unsure how well experience could compensate. However, the headband is a little too rigid which make the headphones tight enough to become uncomfortable during long listening sessions. Paul White, The earpads are much more comfortable than those of AKG's K240, but these phones still feel bulky. For me, the DT880s are the top of the tree: they're not quite as subjectively engaging as the Sennheiser HD650s on a musical level, but are the closest I've got to forgetting that I'm listening on headphones! AKG K72 vs AKG K92 – Whatâs the Difference? EQ decisions made with these seem to translate well to speakers. Beyerdynamic DT 770 vs. AKG - K702. Dynamics are portrayed very naturally. The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the AKG K702 are both great headphones for critical listeners and have very little difference in performance. Sony MDR7509HD: closed-back contender.These are my current preferred closed‑back headphones. Years ago, closed-back phones tended to sound coloured ('boxy') and pretty dreadful, but were fine for cue feeds and checking that a recording was being made. However, if you’re looking for the Gold Standard, the 880 comes in a close second place. Sam Inglis, The large earcups are comfortable for long sessions, although your ears may get a bit sweaty in hot weather. They're quieter than many models, sound a bit muffled, and are not especially revealing. As time went by I was buying (and then ended up selling) pretty much every headphone on the market, excluding flagships. AKG K712. If you can swap over the phones quickly enough, the HD650s seem to produce an even smoother, more natural sound, with a wonderful depth to the low end. Why is AKG K712 Pro better than Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO? What is the difference between Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition and Sennheiser HD6 Mix? Paul White, The HD280s have a very tight fit, giving good isolation, and are reasonably comfortable. Dave Lockwood, With the same sensitivity as the HD600 and styled almost identically, the HD650 uses a slightly heavier and more robust cable, with the same cable connectors as the HD600 (either cable set could be used on either model, but the HD650 version seems to suffer less from handling noise). The good isolation makes them suitable for laptop editing/arranging/composition on the move. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE Q701 in my AKG Q701 vs. K701 COMPARISON!! I'm looking into a new pair of headphones and out of all of the other great headphones I've looked at, I've narrowed it down to these 2 headphones. Offering astonishingly low distortion and almost the same maximum sound pressure level as the HD650s, the HD800s build subtly, but noticeably on the resolution and bandwidth of the HD650s. Sam Inglis, Finding a nice fit was a challenge: at best they still dragged and pressed on my ears rather uncomfortably, the overhead strap seemed insufficiently padded, and their weight never really felt securely anchored. They sound pretty good, with a punchy bass, open mids and only a slightly forward high‑end. We do the majority of the mix on our Grimm speakers but the 880’s and the 702’s are fantastic phones also for an alternative “view” … Matt Houghton, This classic closed‑back design mimics the company's 'industry‑standard' DT100. I was impressed with the extended yet natural low end, detailed mid-range and smooth highs and I would be happy to use these headphones for mixing — though I'd still like to hear my mixes on speakers as well. The tone was warm, going on muffled and boxy, and detail wasn't thick on the ground. Based on our rating, both have the same overall rating of 7.5 out of 10. Hugh Robjohns, These larger enclosed phones have a fairly smooth mid-range and high end, but there's also a lack of low‑end weight. They have quite a 'shouty' voicing, with a prominent high mid‑range and quite subdued bass. Dave Lockwood, This semi-open design apparently incorporates an innovative bass reflex loading. I'd be happy doing some mixing with these, but wouldn't like to rely on them alone — and I'd have reservations about using them for long sessions, as I personally found the high end a tad fatiguing. As alluded to above, the bass on the DT 880 is quite lean, as opposed to the meaty, heavy, bass-head friendly DT 990. A note to potential buyers: Upon further research, the HD600’s are the better option for mixing. The circular ear cups are semi open as opposed to the open design of the DT 990 which combined with the more premium, metal enclosures makes the DT 880 look much more expensive than their price range. Mike Senior, Fostex T50RPThese have old‑fashioned styling and felt flimsy. The ear-pad material generated a lot of rustling from small head movements, too. Given the open‑backed design, isolation is limited, and spill might cause problems when overdubbing. The earpads and cables aren't easily replaceable. Sony MDR-7510 vs Audio Technica ATH-M50 – Which Headphones are Better? The overall tone is fairly mellow, so initially you may find yourself undermixing the bass and overmixing the treble. Tonally, you get the same kind of slightly mellow highs as on the HD650s, and while this avoids fatigue it's by no means lacking fine detail: you're made perfectly aware of early‑onset distortion or excessive sibilance, without them simultaneously chewing your ears off. Mike Senior. The tone is evenly balanced, though slightly brittle and with a hint of boxiness at around 1kHz, but not enough to cause serious problems. ... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition. Matt Houghton, The folding, collapsible design of the SRH840s is similar to the MDR7509 HDs, while the single-sided cable connection includes a neat twist-lock connector. Hugh Robjohns, Ultrasone Pro 900.The Pro900s offer moderate isolation and are more sensitive than most (+3dB). Is it really about new sounds these d... Re: Cheap and Nasty handheld vocal microphone. Not ideal for mixing. Ultrasone: Audio Limited +44 (0)1494 511 711. Bass lines come across evenly and cleanly, and the perception of bass balance is close to what I'd expect from good nearfields. These are Beyer's best-kept secret! They're the same sensitivity as the DT250s and offer a very well-balanced sound spectrum, with extended bass. Sam Inglis, The combination of light weight and a well‑judged head‑pressure gave a really secure and comfortable fit for the circumaural earcups, which deliver decent isolation and fairly low spill levels. The sound is nicely balanced, with a realistically extended low end and natural, open‑sounding highs with plenty of overall detail and mid-range clarity. Let me know your opinions on these two. They're comfortable and not at all over‑bright, so you can listen for a long time without getting tired. These large, bulky phones don't fold, and as they're open‑backed there's very poor isolation of external sounds. Archived. Compare AKG K702 vs AKG K712 PRO headphones side-by-side. Mastering Essentials Part 4 - Mastering EQ: Balance, Don’t Match. Mike Senior, These very comfortable and stable phones fold for convenient storage. Mike Senior, Sennheiser's acclaimed HD650 — one of the leading contenders for mixing.This fully open model is beautifully open‑sounding, with a balanced spectrum and good dynamics. Mike Senior, The swivel‑mount, folding design is convenient, and I find the ATH M50s comfortable, even for longish periods. ... AKG K712. Paul White, The small supra‑aural earcups exert a fair bit of pressure on the ears, and are a touch uncomfortable after a while. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers. AKG K702 K702: Semi-open, 62Ω, ... and the Beyerdynamic DT880s seemed to get the most plaudits as mixing phones, with the AKG K702s and other Sennheiser and Beyer models coming close behind — all of which are open‑backed or semi-open-backed models. Beyerdynamic: Polar Audio +44 (01444)258 258. Win! Lighter and with a more secure fit, they provide a clearer, though still warm, tone, with better‑controlled bass — but they retain the good rejection of outside noise and control over leakage. I was expecting more, and couldn't justify the expense for studio tracking or mixing. Mixes seem to transfer well to monitors. The tone feels quite balanced, but with an upper mid-range hardness, emphasised at higher volumes, which I found slightly fatiguing — so be careful to maintain a fairly consistent monitoring level if you're going to use these as a mixing reference. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. Je vais passer quelques jours à les tester. Very comfortable to wear for short periods, they do tend to squash the pinnae after a while. The sound quality is very open: brighter than HD650s and a little lighter on the bass, but with a similar feel. In practice, a little experience allows you to compensate, and thereafter EQ judgements translate very reliably. HP Ravillion x360 for Windows music production? More of a problem was that the balance of the mid-range frequency spectrum seemed lumpy, adding an unwelcome element of guesswork to both EQ and balance decisions. Although fader levels felt slightly easier to judge further up the frequency range, and transients were nippier than on other cans aimed at overdubbing, I was unable to make reliable tonality judgements. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. I preferred the low end of these phones over the similarly priced MDR7509s, but the latter outgun the Beyerdynamics when it comes to picking apart the upper regions of the mix — so it's tricky to say which will give you the best mix. vs. Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro. AKG K712 Pro. vs. AKG K701. Performance is on a par with the Sennheiser HD600, but with a slightly fuller bottom end and more natural and accurate top end than Beyer's own DT770s. What is a "hybrid" audio interface anyway? AKG. Jules Harding, AKG's circular earpads caught the edges of my ears, making them feel cramped after only 15 minutes. Je n’ai pas résisté à l’envie de faire une petite écoute préliminaire sur chacun d’eux. The DT150's combination of thick, warm tonality and softened transients is tailored for overdubbing purposes, where it significantly reduces fatigue at high listening volumes. The sound is smooth and flattering, with capacious low end, but low‑frequency transients seem slow off the mark and slightly smeared in time, influencing my ability to judge balance between bass and kick. Isolation is good, and leakage minimal, yet they seem to reveal plenty of detail for a closed‑back design. DT990 is Beyerdynamic's three decades old take on open big soundstage headphone, with fun very good for open headphone bass impact. Overall, while the HD280 is a worthy mix tool, I preferred the tonality of the DT250 and K240 MkII and would personally go for those first. Excellent dynamics and resolution. Bass extension seemed good, though, and not deliberately hyped. Mixing was performed with open‑back cans, which still tend to sound far more open and natural, especially at the high end. Get DT 880 or AKG K 702 instead. However, it can be hard to pinpoint the right levels for lead and bass instruments. If you want to get into mixing you will probably invest in some monitors sooner or later. At Sound Liaison we have been using Beyer Dt 880 and Akg 702 to great satisfaction when checking for phase and such problems. Mike Senior, I found these phones pretty friendly for mixing, with a smooth, open sound, and not too much hype in any particular area. I wouldn't recommend these for mixing, but they're fine for tracking and auditioning. Hugh Robjohns, These have a more transparent and open sound than AKG's closed‑back designs, but perhaps at the expense of true deep bass. I know that I will need a DAC/AMP for both of these, especially the DT 990, less so for the K702. Based on our rating, K712 PRO has a total rating of 7.5 out of 10 vs 7 for DT 880 Pro. We really are into the realm of diminishing returns, though, and only the seriously fanatical will feel comfortable justifying the considerable additional cost.